Scattered Progress by Reexamining the Familiar in
Quest for Antimicrobials
Like its predecessors, the 40th Interscience Conference on
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC), held in Toronto, Ontario,
Canada, last September, was awash in reports on promising new
antimicrobial agents. Many belong to familiar classes of drugs, but
present some advantage or another over their siblingsor rather their
aunts and uncles. All are beset by the challenges of going beyond
proving in vitro effects to establish genuine efficacy and safety
features. Here are some selected highlights, with apologies for the many
candidate drugs that could not be represented.
The first members in the class of macrolide antibiotics were
discovered nearly a half-century ago, and there have been three main
"waves" of them since then, according to Andre Bryskier of
Aventis Pharmaceuticals in Romainville, France, who spoke during the
symposium, "What New Advances Can We Expect from Existing
Antiinfective Classes?" However, waves of pathogens manifesting
resistance tend to follow each wave of new macrolides. For instance, in
Europe, the United States, and elsewhere there is widespread resistance
to the familiar macrolide erythromycin among isolates of the pathogen Streptococcus
pneumoniae, a major cause of community-acquired pneumonia, he says.
However, such isolates remain sensitive to the ketolides, a class of
semisynthetic derivatives of erythromycin, some of whose members show
promise for being part of the next macrolide wave, according to Bryskier.
Referring to telithromycin as the prototype of this subclass, he points
out that it is bactericidal, capable of "5 logs of killing."
It works by inhibiting protein synthesisalbeit by a somewhat
different means than does erythromycin. Thus, this ketolide seems not
only to bind to 50S ribosomal units in bacterial cells but also to 30S
subunits, perhaps accounting for why it remains active against them and
inhibits protein synthesis even in bacterial isolates that are resistant
to erythromycin, he points out. Moreover, it can overcome a common
drug-efflux mechanism whereby some pathogens gain resistance to several
antibiotics at once.
In a similar spirit, the venerable class of beta-lactam antibiotics
can still be counted on to yield new agents that are safer and more
potent than many of their predecessors, according to Michael Dudley of
Microcide Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in Mountain View, Calif. Some of the
newer beta-lactam compounds are "built to have high activity"
against pathogens and, thus, are "not your father's
Oldsmobile," he says. Several carbapenem compounds, including some
with enhanced oral availability, and additional cephalosporins are now
being evaluated, and they may be expected to provide help in combating
infections in hospital settings and also in sparing the use of
fluoroquinolones when used to combat community-acquired respiratory
infections.
The first quinolone antibiotics were discovered in the 1960s, and two
decades later this class came to be dominated by the fluoroquinolones,
according to Carl Catrenich of Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals in
Mason, Ohio, who spoke during the symposium, "Quinolone
Structure-activity Relationships (SAR): Back and Forth." However,
he says, "If proper constituents are chosen, nonfluorinated
quinolone (NFQs) compounds can be designed with more potency than the
fluorinated derivatives." He and his collaborators are testing a
sizable number of NFQs, and find that many of them perform "better
than the benchmark" antibiotics in a series of tests, particularly
when being evaluated against drug-resistant strains. Some of the NFQs,
which show promising "broad-spectrum" activity and appear in
vitro to be "less susceptible to the development of resistance and
cross-resistance," may well offer an "opportunity to improve
on the fluoroquinolones," he says.
Some of the energy devoted to finding and developing new
antimicrobial agents is directed to finding drugs active against fungal
pathogens. Amphotericin B in its own class and the azoles are the
dominant antifungal agents now in widespread clinical use. But
considerable interest and hope now focuses on several members of another
class of antifungal drugs, the echinocandins, according to John Rex of
the University of Texas Medical School in Houston. Although initially
studied in the 1980s and soon abandoned because of solubility problems,
three newer representatives of this class are now "pretty far along
in clinical development," he says.
The echinocandins appear to work by inhibiting the enzyme glucan
synthase but certainly interfere in some way with the synthesis of
glucan, which is a component of the fungal wall, Rex says. Because wall
synthesis is "distinctly a property of fungi, inhibiting it can be
lethal, and there should be no cross-resistance with other antifungal
drugs." All three of the echinocandins now being evaluated
clinically appear to have long half-lives, outstanding safety profiles,
good solubility but poor oral availability, and decent antifungal
activities, albeit tending to be "more static than cidal"
against Aspergillus, a particularly difficult fungal pathogen, he
notes. In general, the activity against various Candida species
is "stellar," he adds, while the somewhat poorer efficacy
against Aspergillus species may be overcome by using the
echinocandins in combination with other antifungal agents.
Jeffrey L. Fox