Smoking and IBD
The relationship between smoking cigarettes and inflammatory bowel
disease (IBD) is now firmly established but remains a source of
confusion among both patients and doctors. The literature strongly
supports the fact that smoking cigarettes is associated with Crohn's
disease (CD) and that nonsmoking is associated with ulcerative colitis (UC).
CD patients who are smokers suffer from severe episodes of the disease,
indicated by a flare-up of inflammation and acute symptoms. As in UC
patients and healthy controls, these symptoms are limited in those CD
patients who are nonsmokers. The chronic, transmural, and debilitating
inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract in CD patients has
been associated with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis
(MAP), a fastidious, acid-fast bacillus responsible for similar IBD in
cattle. Nicotine is considered to be the most pharmacologically active
and addictive substance among the many compounds present in tobacco
products. Why does smoking increase the risk of developing CD and the
risk of disease recurrence after an operation for CD? Why does smoking
decrease the risk of developing UC? We were astonished to see the
enormous amount of data that associates smoking cigarettes with CD that
addressed the negative effect on the clinical course of it in these
patients. However, the current literature provides limited explanations
regarding the mechanism of the effect of smoking and IBD. We recently
evaluated the effect of nicotine, using the Bactec system, on several
microorganisms, including MAP, the suspected etiological agent in some
CD cases. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was at least 50
times lower than the nicotine level in saliva of smokers who smoke 10
cigarettes per day. The data confirmed that nicotine's effect is
bactericidal, leading to the destruction and degradation of MAP and
maybe other microorganisms. We speculate that the inconsistent, high
level of nicotine in CD patients who smoke may affect the MAP or other
microorganism residing in ulcerated mucosal cells. Consequently,
numerous antigens or groups of antigens (some of which have strong
cross- reactivity with intestinal proteins) may be released, causing a
strong inflammatory immune response. This may lead to an acute CD
presence in tobacco users versus nonsmoking CD patients or other
controls regardless of their tobacco habits. Alternatively, nicotine's
inhibitory effect on normal intestinal flora such as Escherichia coli
and Staphylococcus spp. could enable opportunistic pathogens to
proliferate and serve as foci for subsequent infections. Clearly, the
effect of nicotine on pathogens and normal flora needs to be elucidated.
The outcome would provide significant data toward either a beneficiary
use of nicotine to treat infectious diseases or nicotine's role in
causing subsequent infections and complications in mucosal conditions.
Saleh A. Naser
George Ghobrial
University of Central Florida, Orlando