Strengthening Regulon Response Termed
"Learning" in E. coli
Although not the brightest bulb in the class, Escherichia coli
can learn, and this studious form of microbial behavior might even
resemble a piece of a neural net analog, according to Jan Tommassen and
Sally Hoffer of the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands and their
collaborators.
"The demonstration of this `learning' behavior is the first
evidence for a neural network characteristic in a prokaryotic
cell," Tommassen says, referring to findings his group published in
the Journal of Bacteriology (83:4914-4917). "Many
bacteria have a remarkable capacity to adapt to fluctuating
environmental conditions. This adaptation often proceeds via
two-component regulatory systems, which usually consist of a sensor in
the cytoplasmic membrane and a response regulator in the
cytoplasm." When the sensor detects an appropriate signal, it
activates the response regulator, which triggers transcription of the
relevant genes.
In the Dutch group's experiments, cells of E. coli were
exposed to a medium in which phosphate levels were very low. PhoR, a
sensor in the cytoplasmic membrane of the cells, registers low
phosphate. It signals the response regulator, PhoB, to induce the Pho
regulon, which encompasses genes that encode for proteins including
"transporters and enzymes that function to scavenge traces of
inorganic phosphate and phosphorylated compounds from the extracellular
medium," Tommassen says.
Expression of both sensor and response regulator genes rises during
phosphate starvation, and in contrast to other regulatory proteins, the
proteins that they encode both appear to be stable, which is, the
investigators think, key to the "learning" that the cells do.
Thus, in subsequent cycles, increased expression of the relevant
proteins results in faster induction of the Pho regulon the next time
the cells are starved for phosphate, Tommassen explains. This
strengthened response represents what Tommassen characterizes as
learning in E. coli.
E. coli and other comparable bacteria have many more
two-component regulatory systems. "The genome sequence has revealed
that E. coli contains about 30 two-component systems, which
display considerable mutual sequence homology among the sensors and
among the response regulators," says Tommassen. These sensory
response systems probably work together to coordinate responses to a
multitude of environmental conditions through cross-regulation among the
systems, and this crosstalk is what would constitute the functional
equivalent of a neural net, according to Tommassen. "The response
regulators might act as logical operators at the crosstalk points,
integrating different input signals into an appropriate output."
Several studies suggest that cross-regulation occurs. "For
example, the Pho regulon can be expressed in the absence of the sensor
PhoR by cross-regulation via CreC," Tommassen says, referring to
another regulon whose sensor ordinarily responds to carbon instead of
phosphate. Additionally, Masahiro Matsubara of Nagoya University in
Nagoya, Japan, demonstrated that porin expression, which is regulated by
the EnvZ-OmpR two-component system and depends on the osmolarity of the
growth medium, is tuned under anaerobic growth by cross-phosphorelay
through the ArcB anaerosensor.
This is not the first suggestion that bacteria can perform feats
which require learning or memory. Daniel Koshland of the University of
California, Berkeley, and others showed that E. coli can sense a
gradient of a chemical attractant by sensing a change in the
concentration of the attractant over time, a change which they respond
to by directing their formerly random swimming in the direction of
greater concentration. That requires a memory, brief as it may be. And
Gerald Hazelbauer of the University of Missouri-Columbia showed how that
memory may work, also in E. coli. He found that modification of
receptor sites for galactose provides information about galactose levels
in the medium from a few seconds in the past.
Whether a neural net analog really exists in E. coli depends
in large part on whether other two-component systems exhibit similar
"learning" responses to environmental signals, according to
Donald Pettigrew of Texas A&M University in College Station. The big
question, he says, is whether "this is the first case of a general
phenomenon previously unknown, or some unique system that has some cool
properties that we need to try to understand." To Pettigrew, the
most surprising result is the stability of the proteins encoded by PhoR
and PhoB. "I'm of the school of thought that these things don't
last very long in these regulatory systems."
David Holzman
David Holzman writes from Lexington, Mass.