Research on Human ES Cells, Cloning
When President Bush announced his plan for permitting federally
funded human embryonic stem (ES) cell research last August, he insisted
that those studies be restricted to a limited number of already
established human ES lines. In hearing of those limits, scientists eager
to move forward with such research instantly began raising questions
about inevitable difficulties in dealing with the immune system that can
be expected when basic ES cell findings become ready for testing and use
in clinical settings.
Notwithstanding those concerns, the go-ahead for human ES cell
research will enable researchers to better address many nagging
questions over several autoimmune diseases, with longer-term
implications for research on gene therapy and even infectious diseases.
In much the same vein, the rising tide in Congress against any studies
that could involve the cloning of human cells could impede efforts to
study such diseases using materials obtained directly from those
afflicted with them.
In terms of federal policy, the issues of human ES cell and cloning
research became entangled during the extensive public debate over them
last July and August. Politicians and much of the scientific
establishment, for example, joined in deploring the disclosed plans of
several doctors and a biotechnology company to attempt to clone
individual humans as a means for aiding them to reproduce.
During a day-long meeting in August convened by the National Academy
of Sciences (NAS) in Washington, D.C., scientists, clinicians, and
bioethicists evaluated results from recent animal cloning experiments as
well as those partly disclosed human cloning plans. Even as most
participants deplored those clinical efforts as dangerously premature,
some of them also worried that an out-and-out ban on all other research
in this field could prove detrimental.
For instance, it might very well be helpful to use cloned cells from
individuals with specific diseases as a safe and efficient way of
studying those diseases at the cellular level in vitro, according to
Irving Weissman of Stanford University in Stanford, Calif., who chairs
the NAS cloning review panel. Moreover, many kinds of future therapeutic
applications that come from ES cell research will likely depend on
producing cells through cloning procedures that carry the precise
immunologic signature of the individuals in whom they will be used.
However, President Bush all but precluded any early immunologic
fine-tuning when he limited funding through the National Institutes of
Health (NIH) for human ES cell research to only those "existing
stem cell lines, where the life-and-death decision has already been
made." Although the numbers remain uncertain, NIH officials say
that some 60 or so "genetically diverse" stem cell lines that
were developed in the United States and several other countries will
meet Bush's criteria of acceptability for use in federally funded
research projects. His restrictions do not apply to human ES cell
research, including the derivation of new ES cell lines, conducted in
the private sector.
"We're pleased with the President's decision to allow the use of
federal funds for important basic research on human embryonic stem
cells," says NIH Acting Director Ruth Kirschstein. "Using the
more than 60 existing cell lines from around the world, many more
researchers will now be able to explore the potential of human embryonic
stem cells, in addition to the extensive work already sponsored by NIH
using human adult stem cells."
The signal to move forward on such stem cell research is "a very
positive thing," adds Anthony Fauci, director of the NIH National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Such ES cells offer new
ways to look at questions of "immunocompatability," have the
"potentialfor reconstituting the immune system," and could be
of particular importance in combatting HIV/AIDS, he points out. "We
have so little experience with embryonic-derived stem cellswhich is the
reason why we need to do fundamental research."
In a report on stem cell research prepared by NIH for President Bush
and Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson, officials
point to autoimmune diseases as a particularly important area in which
stem cells may contribute. For example, the report points to lupus,
citing studies in mice in which hematopoietic stem cells are equipped
with a "decoy" receptor for gamma-interferon to slow progress
of this disease. Similarly, introducing other modified cytokine genes
into ES cells that would differentiate into pancreatic beta cells might
provide a means for blocking the autoimmune process that is believed to
destroy such cells, leading to diabetes.
Jeffrey L. Fox