Extraordinary Anaerobic
Ammonium-Oxidizing Bacteria
Unusual microbial metabolic process, although slow,
can remove ammonium from wastewater in a single, oxygen-limited step
J. G. Kuenen and M. S. M. Jetten
What would you do if someone from industry approached
you with a claim that ammonium was disappearing in his anoxic wastewater
treatment plant at the expense of nitrite? Some would dismiss this claim
as "not in the textbook." Others might remember a prediction
by Engelbert Broda some 20 years ago that this should be possible on
thermodynamic grounds and challenge the colleague to prove that Broda
was right. Well, what happened was that we were asked to take up the
challenge. We accepted, not guessing that it would take 10 years to
crack the problem of anaerobic ammonium oxidation, later called the
anammox process.
In facing the challenge, the first thing we did was to
reevaluate the nitrogen balance of the wastewater treatment plant by
observing the fate of 15N-labeled NH4+ that we added to the
system. On the basis of such analysis, our Ph.D. student Astrid van de
Graaf established unequivocally that ammonium combines quantitatively
with available 14N-nitrite to give mixed 14-15N2
dinitrogen gas. Soon after, we proved that the reaction is sensitive to
heat sterilization, gamma irradiation, and several uncouplers, has a pH
optimum at about 8, and a temperature optimum at 37ºC.
Proof that the Reaction Is Biological Launched a
Difficult Microbiological Analysis
Figure 1
Although those first studies proved ammonium oxidation
is a biological process, they also marked the start of our struggle to
explore the microbiological nature of this process. Even today we cannot
grow the bacterium responsible for this process in pure culture. Nobody
can. But we know its identity: "Candidatus Brocadia
anammoxidans." "Brocadia" refers to the place of its
discovery, a Gist-Brocades pilot plant where Arnold Mulder, the
industrial colleague who first detected the reaction, was working. This
bacterium belongs to the exotic order of the Planctomycetales (Fig.
1), organisms that have no peptidoglycan in their cell walls, possess
unusual features on the cell surface known as crateriform structures,
reproduce by budding, and, most exciting of all, appear to be
compartmentalized in membranous structures reminiscent of those found
among eukaryotes.
The only way in which we could enrich Candidatus
B. anammoxidans was through use of flow-through systems. Other more
commonly used techniques, such as batch cultures, proved fruitless for
studying these microorganisms. However, once we established the
flow-through approach for growing them, we had a practical means for
fully characterizing the organism.
Figure 2
Specifically, Marc Strous, at that time working on his
Ph.D., developed a successful cultivation system based on a 15-liter
anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (SBR) (Fig. 2), which was fed with a
mineral medium containing only ammonium, nitrite ( NH4+
+ NO2-, 30 mmol/liter each), and bicarbonate.
Every day the SBR goes through 2 cycles: each cycle starts with 11.5
hours of gentle stirring, while continuously feeding the medium. After
11.5 hours of feeding, we stop the gentle stirring, let the bacterial
flocs settle for 10 minutes in the reactor, and then remove the
supernatant in 20 minutes. In this way we efficiently retain biomass;
moreover, cells grow exponentially to form a very dense culture of 5 x
1010 cells/ml. (Fig. 2). Although not pure, this culture
contains more than 70% coccoid cells of Candidatus B.
anammoxidans and is brightly red from the cytochromes that these
bacteria contain. The culture grows autotrophically with CO2
as the only carbon source.
The overall anammox process consists of the following
two reactions:
Catabolic reaction:
NH4+ + NO2- ® N2
+ 2H2O (1)
Anabolic reaction:
CO2 +2NO2- + H2O ® CH2O
(biomass) + 2NO3- (2)
Thus, NO2- is not only the
e-acceptor in reaction (1) but also the e-donor for CO2
fixation (2). In fact, the latter reaction is analogous to the carbon
assimilation of aerobic, chemolithoautotrophic, nitrite-oxidizing
bacteria. Indeed, these reactionsone carried out by aerobic
ammonium-oxidizing bacteria such as Nitrosomonas europaea and the
other by Candidatus B. anammoxidanshave many features in
common (see table).
For instance, the thermodynamics and biomass yields are
very similar. However, the big difference is in their aerobic and
anaerobic rates of ammonium oxidation and in their maximum specific
growth rates (µmax). Candidatus B. anammoxidans
is a very slowly growing obligately anaerobic bacterium, with doubling
times of 10-14 days. The aerobic nitrifiers, such as Nitrosomonas,
are facultatively anaerobic, growing relatively fast under oxic
conditions (td = 0.7 day). These organisms can also
metabolize ammonium and nitrite anaerobically, but their rate is at
least 30 times lower than that of Candidatus B. anammoxidans.
Mechanism of Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation: a Working
Model
Experiments with 15N-labeled nitrogen
compounds indicated that in "Candidatus B. anammoxidans,"
ammonium and hydroxylamine (NH2OH) combine during a
condensation reaction. When we feed NH2OH to the culture,
very surprisingly hydrazine (N2H4) transiently
accumulates, indicating that this compound is an intermediate. To our
knowledge, this rocket fuel is not known as a free intermediate in any
other biological system.
Figure 3
Our finding this hydrazine intermediate led to our
working model (Fig. 3) for energy transduction and the buildup of an
electrochemical gradient in this microorganism. In this scheme, the
hydrazine-forming enzyme, hydrazine hydrolase (HZF), remains
hypothetical. However, an enzyme capable of oxidizing hydrazine (HZO)
accounts for 10% of the total protein of Candidatus B.
anammoxidans enrichment cultures, according to our Ph.D. student Jos
Schalk, who purified the enzyme to homogeneity.
At first we thought this enzyme resembles the
hydroxyamine oxidoreductase (HAO) of N. europaea. However, the
HZO/HAO of Candidatus B. anammoxidans has a lower molecular mass,
and peptides obtained after trypsin digestion show no homology with the
proteins represented in the database of N. europaea or any other
organisms. The enzyme of Candidatus B. anammoxidans is active
only under anoxic conditions and produces NO and N2O from
hydroxylamine, whereas the N. europaea enzyme oxidizes
hydroxylamine aerobically to nitrite. Both enzyme systems can oxidize
hydrazine to N2.
In terms of our model, HZO/HAO would function as the
hydrazine-oxidizing enzyme (hydrazine-cytochrome c oxidoreductase).
HZO/HAO contains 3 a subunits and carries approximately 24 c-type
cytochromes. Similar to the N. europaea enzyme, there is an
additional very characteristic cytochrome peak at 468 nm that can be
(partly) reduced by hydrazine and hydroxylamine. The high HZO/HAO
content of the Candidatus B. anammoxidans culture also explains
the bright red color of the biomass (see photograph). According to our
model (Fig. 3), four electrons from hydrazine would be needed to reduce
the nitrite to hydroxylamine. Thus a closed cyclic system would lead to
the buildup of a proton-motive force across the membrane, which, in
turn, would allow ATP synthesis. We are continuing to study this
pathway.
Frustrations with Efforts To Obtain Pure Cultures
Table 1
Frustrated in all our attempts to purify Candidatus
B. anammoxidans, we tried using DNA-based methods to learn more about
it. The standard way for obtaining pure DNA from an organism growing in
mixed culture is to isolate RNA or DNA from the mix and then amplify and
clone the 16S rDNA via reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain
reaction, or RT-PCR. However, the presumed universal 16S rDNA primer set
was not so universalinstead, as we found out later, having three
mismatches with that of Candidatus B. anammoxidans. Hence, we did
not find the expected (70%) dominant 16S-rDNA on gels or in our
clone-libraries.
To overcome this difficulty, Katinka van de Pas-Schoonen
and Marc Strous painstakingly developed a Percoll density gradient
centrifugation procedure to separate cells of Candidatus B.
anammoxidans from other members of the community. Eventually, they
obtained 99.6% pure cultures. From the DNA of these purified cultures,
we identified the dominant bacterium as a member of Planctomycetales,
branching very deep within this lineage (Fig. 1). The purified
individual cells responded to eight specific fluorescent in situ
hybridization (FISH) probes that were designed on the basis of the 16S
rDNA-gene sequence. Very importantly, the purified cells also showed
active anaerobic ammonium oxidation with nitrite as well as the expected
simultaneous CO2 fixation. In this way we unequivocally
established that Candidatus B. anammoxidans is responsible for
the anammox reaction.
Anammox activity of the purified suspensions of Candidatus
B. anammoxidans could be restored only by reconcentrating cells back to
the original density of 1010-1011 cells/ml and
adding micromolar quantities of either hydroxylamine or hydrazine. In
trying to explain the need to concentrate the cells, we consider it very
unlikely that the 1 in 500 contaminating cells contribute significantly
to the anammox activity of the purified preparations. For one thing,
they would need to have enzymes with extremely high activities.
Furthermore, although we can detect a few contaminating cells, they are
very diverse in terms of morphology.
However, although we believe that the purified Candidatus
B. anammoxidans is responsible for the anammox reaction and for fixing
CO2, we also believe that other bacteria in the community
might play a vital role during prolonged growth of this organism,
perhaps providing it vitamins or removing toxic intermediates. It is
conceivable that cell-cell communication through molecular signal
compounds is required for activity. Another possibility is that the
hydrazine intermediate can diffuse out of the cells relatively easily
and needs to be maintained at a critical concentrationhence, the need
for high cell densities.
DiversityIs Everything Everywhere?
Although other investigators initially could not
duplicate our enrichment culture-based findings, once they took the slow
growth rate into account, enrichment cultures with similar but not
identical bacteria were established in several different laboratories.
The first confirmations of the anammox reaction came from a team in
Germany who used samples taken from pilot-wastewater plants in which
there was high ammonium loading.
To characterize the microorganisms responsible for those
reactions, we and our collaborators Markus Schmid and Michael Wagner in
the Department of Microbiology of the Technical University of Munich,
Germany, used the same molecular probes that helped us earlier to
establish the identity of Candidatus B. anammoxidans. This series
of 16S-rDNA-probe-binding experiments established that a range of
similar, but not identical, bacteria can carry out the anammox reaction.
Indeed, the anammox bacteria from the wastewater
treatment plants in Germany are not closely related to Candidatus
B. anammoxidans. Instead, they appear to belong to a separate
monophyletic cluster (90% similarity to that of Candidatus B.
anammoxidans), which was given the name "Candidatus Kuenenia
stuttgartiensis." FISH probes indicate that these bacteria are
dominant in communities responsible for high nitrogen turnover in
wastewater treatment plants. Follow-up studies with functional probes
could help us to learn more about the environmental variables that give
rise to such extensive diversity of anammox bacteria among these
disparate communities.
Morphology and Electron Microscopy
Figure 4
With John Fuerst and his colleagues at the University of
Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, we showed that the Candidatus
B. anammoxidans cells contain at least three membrane-bound compartments
(Fig. 4): the outer compartment containing the paryphoplasm; a second
inner compartment, containing the ribosomes and the condensed, or
nucleoid, DNA; and a third inner-membrane-bound compartment making up
30-60% of the Candidatus B. anammoxidans volume.
Immunogold-labeling experiments indictate that this
third compartment, or organelle, contains the HZO/HAO enzyme, leading us
to name it the anammoxosome. Although the function of all three
compartments remains uncertain, we speculate that the anammoxosome
generates an electrochemical gradient across its membrane (Fig. 3). The
big anammoxosome gives a special feature to FISH-stained cells, setting
off the ribosomes in the compartment surrounding it in a fluorescent
circle. Because FISH probes reveal a similar fluorescent ring in Candidatus
K. stuttgartiensis, we suspect it has a similar ultrastructure.
Ecology, Combined Anoxic and Oxic Ammonium Oxidation
The wide distribution of bacteria capable of oxidizing
ammonium under anoxic conditions raises questions about their natural
habitat and about conditions that favor their growth in wastewater
treatment systems. We know from experiments that the activity of the
anammox enrichment cultures is very sensitive to oxygen. Even 0.5 % of
air saturation (1 µM oxygen) completely stops the reaction.
However, low oxygen levels block the reaction without
killing the organisms. After anoxic conditions are restored, cultures
immediately resume oxidizing ammonium at the expense of nitrite. This
behavior is in sharp contrast to that of cultures of aerobic nitrifiers
such as N. europaea, which are capable of very slow anaerobic
metabolism. Even if these organisms are provided with 25 ppm of nitrogen
dioxide to stimulate anaerobic metabolism, their rate is 30 times lower
(see table) than that of the Candidatus B. anammoxidans culture.
Notably, in our anammox enrichment cultures we consistently detect low
levels of aerobic nitrifiers, confirming earlier observations that these
organisms can survive anoxic condition for prolonged periods.
Based on such observations, the oxic-anoxic interface
would appear to be the preferred habitat for Candidatus B.
anammoxidans. At such sites, oxygen-limited cells of ammonium oxidizers
such as N. europaea would be available to provide nitrite that,
in the absence of oxygen, could be used by the anaerobic ammonium
oxidizers to consume remaining ammonium.
With this in mind, Olav Sliekers and Katie Third in our
laboratory created a coculture of the highly enriched anammox culture
with aerobic nitrifiers in a sequencing batch reactor. To do so, they
provided increasing quantities of limiting oxygen to the Candidatus
B. anammoxidans enrichment while ensuring that all oxygen is immediately
consumed by the culture. These conditions lead to a gradual increase of
aerobic nitrifiers in the culture, eventually reaching a stage in which
30 mmol/liter of ammonium is converted into mainly (>80%) dinitrogen
gas and some nitrate according to equation (3)
2.5 NH4+ + 2.1 O2 ®
0.2 NO3- + 1.15 N2 + 3.6 H2O
+ 2.8 H+ (3)
Part (1.15/2.5 * 30 mmol/liter) of the ammonium
presumably is oxidized to nitrite by the aerobic nitrifiers and
immediately converted to dinitrogen gas by the anammox bacteria.An
additional portion (0.2/2.5 * 30 mmol/liter) is oxidized to nitrite by
the same aerobic nitrifiers and then on to nitrate by the anammox
bacteria to provide the reducing power for CO2-fixation by the latter
organisms [see reaction (2)]. When biomass from such cultures is made
aerobic (up to 15% air saturation), the anammox reaction stops, and
ammonium is converted to nitrite but not to nitrate. Apparently, when
oxygen is limited, the aerobic nitrite oxidizers are not enriched.
Tests with FISH probes that are specific for the aerobic
and anaerobic nitrifiers confirm that Candidatus B. anammoxidans
at first dominates the culture for more than 70%, but, with time, Nitrosomonas
type organisms take on an increasingly substantial role. We did not
detect aerobic nitrite-oxidizing bacteria, such as Nitrobacter or
Nitrospira species, suggesting that the combined Nitrosomonas/Brocadia
cultures outcompete the nitrite oxidizers for both oxygen and
nitrite. With Renee Wijffels and his colleagues at the Department of
Process Engineering, Wageningen University and Research Center, the
Netherlands, we immobilized both anammox and nitrifying cells together
in alginate beads, providing a protoype of an air loop reactor capable
of converting ammonium in nitrogen gas.
A similar set of conditions likely exists in naturefor
instance, at the oxic-anoxic interface between water bodies and
sediments. Presumably, ammonium that forms under anoxic conditions would
diffuse to the interface where it would be oxidized, in part, to
nitrite. The nitrite could diffuse back into the anoxic zone and be
reduced with the remaining ammonium.
These observations also could prove useful for
redesigning wastewater treatment plants. Thus, for example, it may be
possible to remove ammonium from wastewater in a single, oxygen-limited
step by means of a recently patented process, "completely
autotrophic N-removal over nitrite," or CANON. This name also
alludes to the subtle interplay of the oxic- and anoxic- ammonium
oxidizing reactions, which can run simultaneously and in tune.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The research on anaerobic ammonium
oxidation was financially supported by the Foundation for Applied
Sciences (STW), the Foundation of Applied Water Research (STOWA), the
Netherlands Foundation for Life Sciences (NWO-ALW), the Royal
Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Gist-brocades, DSM,
Paques BV and Grontmij consultants. We gratefully acknowledge the
contributions of various coworkers and students over the years.
SUGGESTED READING
Fuerst, J. A. 1995.
The planctomycetes: emerging models for microbial ecology, evolution and
cell biology. Microbiology 141:1493-1506.
Jetten, M. S. M., M. Strous, K.T. van de
Pas-Schoonen, J. Schalk, L. van Dongen, A. A. van de Graaf, S. Logemann,
G. Muyzer, M. C. M. van Loosdrecht, and J. G. Kuenen. 1999.
The anaerobic oxidation of ammonium. FEMS Microbiol. Reviews 22:421-437.
Jetten, M. S. M., M. Wagner, J.A. Fuerst,
M. C. M. van Loosdrecht, J. G. Kuenen, and M. Strous. 2001.
Microbiology and application of the anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox)
process. Curr. Opinion Biotechnol. 12:283-288.
Lindsay, M. R., R. I. Webb, M. Strous, M.
S. M. Jetten, M. K. Butler, and J. A. Fuerst. 2001.
Cell compartmentalization in planctomycetes: novel types of structural
organization for the bacterial cell. Arch. Microbiol. 175:413-429.
Schalk, J., S. Devries, J. G. Kuenen, and
M. S. M. Jetten. 2000. A novel hydroxylamine
oxidoreductase involved in the Anammox process. Biochemistry 39:5405-5412.
Schmid, M., U. Twachtmann, M. Klein, M.
Strous, S. Juretschko, M.S.M. Jetten, J. Metzger, K. H. Schleifer, and
M. Wagner. 2000. Molecular evidence for genus
level diversity of bacteria capable of catalyzing anaerobic ammonium
oxidation. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 23:93-106.
Schmidt, I., and E. Bock. 1997.
Anaerobic ammonia oxidation with nitrogen dioxide by Nitrosomonas
eutropha. Arch. Microbiol. 167:106-111.
Strous, M., J. J. Heijnen, J. G. Kuenen,
and M. S. M. Jetten. 1998. The sequencing
batch reactor as a powerful tool to study very slowly growing
microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 50:589-596.
Strous, M., J. G. Kuenen, and M. S. M.
Jetten. 1999. Key physiology of anaerobic
ammonium oxidation. Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 65:3248-3250.
Strous, M., J. A. Fuerst, E. H. M.
Kramer, S. Logemann, G. Muyzer, K. T. van de Pas-Schoonen, R. Webb, J.
G. Kuenen, and M. S. M. Jetten. 1999. Missing
lithotroph identified as new planctomycete. Nature 400:446-449.
Van Dongen, L., M. S. M. Jetten, and M.
C. M. Van Loosdrecht. 2001. The Sharon-Annamox
process for treatment of ammonium rich waste water. Water Sci. Technol. 44:153-160.
PATENTS
Mulder, A. 1992.
Anoxic Ammonium Oxidation US patent 427849(5078884).
Dijkman, H. and M. Strous.
1999. Process for ammonia removal from wastewater. Patent
PCT/NL99/00446.
van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., and M. S. M.
Jetten. 1997. Method for treating
ammonia-comprising wastewater. Patent PCT/NL97/00482.